63% consider international cyber-espionage acceptable
Sophos published the mid-year 2010 Security Threat Report, revealing the findings of a survey into attitudes towards cyberwarfare and detailing other trends and developments in IT security for the first half of 2010.
Sophos’s worldwide survey of 1077 computer users uncovers some alarming attitudes towards international cyber-espionage. Respondents were asked questions including whether they thought spying via hacking or malware attacks is an acceptable practice and if the computer networks of private companies in other countries are legitimate targets.
Some of the key findings of the survey indicate a relaxed attitude to state-sponsored cybercrime:
- 63% of those polled believe that it is acceptable for their country to spy on other nations by hacking or installing malware (23% said yes at any time. 40% said only during wartime, 37% said no)
- A staggering 1 in 14 respondents believe that crippling denial of service attacks against another country’s communication or financial websites are acceptable during peacetime (49% said only in wartime, 44% said never)
- 32% believe that countries should be allowed to plant malware and hack into private foreign companies in order to spy for economic advantage (23% said this was only acceptable in wartime, 9% said in peacetime, 68% said no).
“It’s perhaps surprising that so many people seem to think that using the internet as a tool for spying, or even as a weapon, is acceptable practice,” said Graham Cluley, senior technology consultant at Sophos. “After all, by giving the green light to these kind of activities you’d also have to expect to be on the receiving end too. Maybe yours will be the next company probed by an overseas power?”
‘Operation Aurora’, which first came to light at the start of the year, resulted in Google accusing Chinese hackers of cyberwarfare, as its systems, and those of other companies, were hit with targeted attacks, potentially signalling the most obvious sign yet of a new age of malware.